Annotation of embedaddon/mtr/FORMATS, revision 1.1.1.2
1.1 misho 1:
2: The "split" format is for a separating the gui from the main program.
3: The main program can be installed setuid, and you don't want to link a
4: gui-library with a setuid program.
5:
6:
7: The split format is:
8:
9: <pos> <host> <loss%> <rcvd pckts> <sent pckts> <best> <avg> <worst>
10:
11:
12: The "raw" format is:
13:
1.1.1.2 ! misho 14: hostline|xmitline|pingline|dnsline|timestampline
1.1 misho 15:
16: hostline:
17: h <pos> <host IP>
18:
1.1.1.2 ! misho 19: xmitline:
! 20: x <pos> <seqnum>
! 21:
1.1 misho 22: pingline:
1.1.1.2 ! misho 23: p <pos> <pingtime (ms)> <seqnum>
1.1 misho 24:
25: dnsline:
26: d <pos> <hostname>
27:
28: timestampline:
29: t <pos> <pingtime> <timestamp>
30:
31:
32: Timestampline is not yet implemented. Need to find out how to do
33: ICMP timestamping first. :-)
34:
35:
36: Someone suggested to put the following text here. As to context: Some
37: people are wondering why mtr sometimes reports hosts beyond the
38: destination host.
39:
40:
41: The FINAL host will occasionally be mentioned at position n, n+1, n+2
42: etc.
43:
44: You know traceroute, right? It sends a packet, waits for the reply to
45: come back and when it comes back, it sends the next packet.
46:
47: If say hosts 5-8 do not send "time exceeded" packets, you'll wait a
48: 4*3 = twelve seconds extra before you get any results on hosts 9 and
49: further. MTR doesn't work like that.
50:
51: In theory we could send out a probe for host 1-40 all at once. But
52: this would pose an unnecessary burden on the network. So what we do,
53: is we send out probes for a max of 5 hosts beyond where we've seen a
54: reply. So in the example above, we'd see a reply from router at
55: position 4, then we'd send out 5-9 (and because the max-host is now at
56: 9, we'll send them out at 1s/9 = 111ms intervals). When the reply from
57: host 9 comes back, we'll start probing for host 10-15 (at about 60ms
1.1.1.2 ! misho 58: intervals). But suppose the network delay up to host 9 is already 200ms
1.1 misho 59: and suppose our destination host is at position 11. Then by the time
60: the packet from host 11 comes back, we'll already have sent probe
61: packets for position 12, 13, and 14! Those will come back as
62: "destination reached" and be reported by the "raw" mode.
63:
64: Curses mode will stop showing hosts with position numbers beyond the
65: first reply of the destination host. It could gather the information
66: about replies to packets sent as probes FURTHER than it actually is
67: into the line displayed at its true position, but it doesn't (yet).
68:
69: In fact the above example is almost completely true:
70:
71: % mtr -r -n -c 2 152.179.99.218 | tail -5
72: 13.|-- 144.232.18.238 0.0% 2 94.8 95.4 94.8 96.0 0.8
73: 14.|-- 152.63.16.182 0.0% 2 95.1 95.5 95.1 95.8 0.5
74: 15.|-- 152.63.64.106 0.0% 2 163.9 163.9 163.9 164.0 0.1
75: 16.|-- 152.63.50.89 50.0% 2 163.7 163.7 163.7 163.7 0.0
76: 17.|-- 152.179.99.218 50.0% 2 168.2 168.2 168.2 168.2 0.0
77: % mtr -l -c 2 152.179.99.218 | grep -v "^[dp]" |tail -7
78: h 10 144.232.1.41
79: h 11 144.232.4.96
80: h 16 152.179.99.218
81: h 17 152.179.99.218
82: h 18 152.179.99.218
83: h 12 144.232.18.238
84: h 13 152.63.16.182
85:
86: As you can see we get the reply from the destination host at position
87: 16 AFTER we've sent probes for position 17 and 18. When those come
88: back, they are reported. That's what raw mode does. It reports the raw
89: information.
90:
91: If you write a backend for the raw mode, it's up to you to
92: filter/display the results.
93:
94: h 10 144.232.1.41
95: h 11 144.232.4.96
96: h 12 144.232.18.238
97: h 13 152.63.16.182
98: h 14 152.63.64.106
99: h 15 152.63.50.89
100: h 16 152.179.99.218
101: h 17 152.179.99.218
102: h 18 152.179.99.218
103:
FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>