Annotation of embedaddon/mtr/FORMATS, revision 1.1.1.3
1.1 misho 1:
2: The "split" format is for a separating the gui from the main program.
3: The main program can be installed setuid, and you don't want to link a
4: gui-library with a setuid program.
5:
6:
7: The split format is:
8:
9: <pos> <host> <loss%> <rcvd pckts> <sent pckts> <best> <avg> <worst>
10:
11:
12: The "raw" format is:
13:
1.1.1.3 ! misho 14: hostline|xmitline|pingline|dnsline|timestampline|mplsline
1.1 misho 15:
16: hostline:
17: h <pos> <host IP>
18:
1.1.1.2 misho 19: xmitline:
20: x <pos> <seqnum>
21:
1.1 misho 22: pingline:
1.1.1.2 misho 23: p <pos> <pingtime (ms)> <seqnum>
1.1 misho 24:
25: dnsline:
26: d <pos> <hostname>
27:
28: timestampline:
29: t <pos> <pingtime> <timestamp>
30:
1.1.1.3 ! misho 31: mplsline:
! 32: m <pos> <label> <traffic_class> <bottom_stack> <ttl>
1.1 misho 33:
34: Timestampline is not yet implemented. Need to find out how to do
35: ICMP timestamping first. :-)
36:
37:
38: Someone suggested to put the following text here. As to context: Some
39: people are wondering why mtr sometimes reports hosts beyond the
40: destination host.
41:
42:
43: The FINAL host will occasionally be mentioned at position n, n+1, n+2
44: etc.
45:
46: You know traceroute, right? It sends a packet, waits for the reply to
47: come back and when it comes back, it sends the next packet.
48:
49: If say hosts 5-8 do not send "time exceeded" packets, you'll wait a
50: 4*3 = twelve seconds extra before you get any results on hosts 9 and
51: further. MTR doesn't work like that.
52:
53: In theory we could send out a probe for host 1-40 all at once. But
54: this would pose an unnecessary burden on the network. So what we do,
55: is we send out probes for a max of 5 hosts beyond where we've seen a
56: reply. So in the example above, we'd see a reply from router at
57: position 4, then we'd send out 5-9 (and because the max-host is now at
58: 9, we'll send them out at 1s/9 = 111ms intervals). When the reply from
59: host 9 comes back, we'll start probing for host 10-15 (at about 60ms
1.1.1.2 misho 60: intervals). But suppose the network delay up to host 9 is already 200ms
1.1 misho 61: and suppose our destination host is at position 11. Then by the time
62: the packet from host 11 comes back, we'll already have sent probe
63: packets for position 12, 13, and 14! Those will come back as
64: "destination reached" and be reported by the "raw" mode.
65:
66: Curses mode will stop showing hosts with position numbers beyond the
67: first reply of the destination host. It could gather the information
68: about replies to packets sent as probes FURTHER than it actually is
69: into the line displayed at its true position, but it doesn't (yet).
70:
71: In fact the above example is almost completely true:
72:
73: % mtr -r -n -c 2 152.179.99.218 | tail -5
74: 13.|-- 144.232.18.238 0.0% 2 94.8 95.4 94.8 96.0 0.8
75: 14.|-- 152.63.16.182 0.0% 2 95.1 95.5 95.1 95.8 0.5
76: 15.|-- 152.63.64.106 0.0% 2 163.9 163.9 163.9 164.0 0.1
77: 16.|-- 152.63.50.89 50.0% 2 163.7 163.7 163.7 163.7 0.0
78: 17.|-- 152.179.99.218 50.0% 2 168.2 168.2 168.2 168.2 0.0
79: % mtr -l -c 2 152.179.99.218 | grep -v "^[dp]" |tail -7
80: h 10 144.232.1.41
81: h 11 144.232.4.96
82: h 16 152.179.99.218
83: h 17 152.179.99.218
84: h 18 152.179.99.218
85: h 12 144.232.18.238
86: h 13 152.63.16.182
87:
88: As you can see we get the reply from the destination host at position
89: 16 AFTER we've sent probes for position 17 and 18. When those come
90: back, they are reported. That's what raw mode does. It reports the raw
91: information.
92:
93: If you write a backend for the raw mode, it's up to you to
94: filter/display the results.
95:
96: h 10 144.232.1.41
97: h 11 144.232.4.96
98: h 12 144.232.18.238
99: h 13 152.63.16.182
100: h 14 152.63.64.106
101: h 15 152.63.50.89
102: h 16 152.179.99.218
103: h 17 152.179.99.218
104: h 18 152.179.99.218
105:
FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>